What is Independent Behavior Scales revised

The Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scales

Summary

background

The recording of psychological stress is of central importance in pain research and treatment. There are particular methodological and conceptual difficulties for depression as a comorbidity in pain. The psychometric properties of the German-language short version of the Depression-Anxiety-Stress-Scales (DASS) were checked. The technique is used in pain research and treatment and is designed to solve specific confusion problems by avoiding somatic items and focusing questions on core psychological aspects of depression, anxiety and stress.

method

The psychometric properties of the instrument were examined in patients with pain and in various random samples without a primary pain problem (N = 950). The DASS contains 3 scales with 7 items each. Reliability and construct validity of the DASS were compared with HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and ADS (General Depression Scale). Specificity and sensitivity for depression were determined using a structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SKID) and also compared with ADD and HADS.

Results

Cronbach's α for the depression scale was at least 0.91, the values ​​of the anxiety and stress scale for the revised version are 0.78-0.82 and 0.81-0.89, respectively. Although the depression scale only contains 7 items, it is just as reliable as the ADS with 21 items. The sensitivity and specificity in classifying clinical cases are better than in HADS.

discussion

The DASS is a reliable and economical both in terms of time and costs (the procedure is license-free) alternative to previous procedures for depression screening in pain patients. In addition, the “physical tension” (stress) scale records an aspect that is diagnostically and therapeutically interesting, especially for patients with pain, and has so far only been little researched.

Abstract

Background

The assessment of mental distress is a central aspect in pain research and treatment. Particularly for depression the comorbidity with pain poses methodological and conceptual challenges. This study examined the psychometric properties of the short version of the depression, anxiety and stress scale (DASS), used in both pain research and treatment and constructed to overcome the particular problems by omitting somatic items and concentrating on the psychological core aspects of depression, anxiety and stress.

Method

The psychometric properties of the DASS-21 were compared between patients with pain and various people without any pain problems (N = 950). The DASS has three subscales, depression, anxiety and stress, each with seven items. The construct validity of the DASS was examined using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) for anxiety and depression and the general depression scale (General depression scale, ADS) for depression. The sensitivity and specificity for depression were determined against a structured interview for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) and compared with the Center for Epidemiological Studies depression scale (CESD) and HADS in pain patients.

Results

Cronbach's alpha of the DASS for the depression subscale was at least 0.91, while the anxiety and stress subscales had Cronbach alphas of 0.78-0.82 and 0.81-0.89, respectively. Although the depression subscale has only 7 items, it is just as reliable as the ADS with 21 items. It also has a better sensitivity and specificity than the HADS in identifying clinical patients with depression.

Discussion

The DASS is a reliable questionnaire, free to use and brief to administer; Therefore, it is an alternative to the previously used instruments for the screening of depression. Furthermore, the subscale stress measures irritability and tension, which are important aspects of pain experience but underused in assessment procedures for the diagnosis and treatment evaluation of patients with pain.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

34,95 €

Tax calculation will be finalized during checkout.

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

294,39 €

Tax calculation will be finalized during checkout.

Notes

  1. 1.

    In order to improve readability, the common article “the” for questionnaires - z. B. the FPI, the MMPI - used.

literature

  1. 1

    Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP (1998) Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol Assess 10: 176-181

    Article Google Scholar

  2. 2

    Banks SM, Kerns RD (1996) Explaining high rates of depression in chonic pain: a diathesis-stress framework. Psychol Bull 119: 95-110

    Article Google Scholar

  3. 3

    Blumer D, Heilbronn M (1982) Chronic pain as a variant of depressive disease. The pain-prone disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 170: 381-406

    CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  4. 4

    Brown TA, Chorpita BF, Korotitsch W, Barlow DH (1997) Psychometric propertys of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in different clinical samples. Behav Res Ther 35: 79-89

    CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  5. 5

    Clark LA, Watson D (1991) Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol 100: 316-336

    CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  6. 6

    Cosco TD, Doyle F, Ward M, McGee H (2012) Latent structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a 10-year systematic review. J Psychosom Res 72: 180-184

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  7. 7

    Dohrenwend BP, Raphael KG, Marbach JJ, Gallagher RM (1999) Why is depression comorbid with chronic myofascial face pain? A family study test of alternative hypotheses. Pain 83: 183-192

    CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  8. 8

    Grevitt M, Pande K, O’Dowd J, Webb J (1998) Do first impressions count? Eur Spine J 7: 218-223

    PubMed CentralCASArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  9. 9

    Haggman S, Maher CG, Refshauge KM (2004) Screening for symptoms of depression by physical therapists managing low back pain. Phys Ther 84: 1157-1166

    PubMed Google Scholar

  10. 10

    Hasenbring M, Ahrens S (1987) Depression, pain perception and pain experience in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 37: 149-155

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  11. 11

    Hautzinger M, Bailer M (1993) General Depression Scale, Vol. 1. Beltz, Weinheim

    Google Scholar

  12. 12

    Hautzinger M (1988) The CES-D scale. A depression gauge for use in investigations in the general population. Diagnostica 38: 167-173

    Google Scholar

  13. 13

    Hautzinger M, Keller F, Kühner C (2006) BDI II. Harcourt Test Services, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar

  14. 14

    Hänggi Y, Benz-Fragniere C, Haberkonr K, Furler K, Perrez M (2013) Determinants of parental sensitivity. Kindh Develop 22: 23-30

    Article Google Scholar

  15. 15

    Heinrichs N, Hahlweg K, Bertram H, Kuschel A, Naumann S, Hart B (2006) The long-term effectiveness of parent training for the universal prevention of behavioral disorders in children. Z Klin Psychol Psychother 35: 82-96

    Article Google Scholar

  16. 16

    Herrmann C, Buss U, Snaith RP (1995) HADS-D Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - German version. Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar

  17. 17

    Kammer D (1983) An examination of the psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Diagnostica 24: 48-60

    Google Scholar

  18. 18

    Kliem S, Kessemeier Y, Heinrichs N, Döpfner M, Hahlweg K (2014) The questionnaire on self-efficacy in upbringing (FSW). Diagnostica 60: 35-45

    Article Google Scholar

  19. 19

    Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH (1995) The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther 33: 335-343

    CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  20. 20

    Margraf J, Ehlers A (2002) Beck fear inventory - German version - (BAI). Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar

  21. 21

    Meades R, Ayers S (2011) Anxiety measures validated in perinatal populations: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 133: 1-15

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  22. 22

    Nicholas MK, Asghari A, Blyth FM (2008) What do the numbers mean? Normative data in chronic pain measures. Pain 134: 158-173

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  23. 23

    Parkitny L, McAuley JH, Walton D, Pena Costa LO, Refshauge KM, Wand BM, Di Pietroa F, Moseley GL (2012) Rasch analysis supports the use of the depression, anxiety, and stress scales to measure mood in groups but not in individuals with chronic low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol 65: 189-198

  24. 24

    Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in general populations. Applied Psychological Measurement 1: 385-401

    Article Google Scholar

  25. 25

    Taylor R, Lovibond PF, Nicholas MK, Cayley C, Wilson PH (2005) The utility of somatic items in the assessment of depression in patients with chronic pain: a comparison of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in chronic pain and clinical and community samples. Clin J Pain 21: 91-100

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  26. 26

    Tröster H (2005) Development of a questionnaire on family-related quality of life (FLQ) for mothers with chronically ill children. Kindh Develop 14: 69-78

    Article Google Scholar

  27. 27

    Warmenhoven F, van Weel C, Vissers K, Prins J (2013) Screening instruments for depression in advanced cancer patients: what do we actually measure? Pain Pract 13: 467-475

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  28. 28

    Watson D, Clark LA, Weber K, Assenheimer JS, Strauss ME, McCormick RA (1995a) Testing a tripartite model: II. Exploring the symptom structure of anxiety and depression in student, adult, and patient samples. J Abnorm Psychol 104: 15-25

  29. 29

    Watson D, Weber K, Assenheimer JS, Clark LA, Strauss ME, McCormick RA (1995b) Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales. J Abnorm Psychol 104: 3-14

  30. 30

    Williams AC, Richardson PH (1993) What does the BDI measure in chronic pain? Pain 55: 259-266

    CASArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  31. 31

    Wood BM, Nicholas MK, Blyth F, Asghari A, Gibson S (2010) The utility of the short version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) in elderly patients with persistent pain: does age make a difference? Pain Med 11: 1780-1790

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. DRK Pain Center, Auf der Steig 14, 55131, Mainz, Germany

    Dr. P. Nilges

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London, England

    C. Essau

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dr. P. Nilges.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

P. Nilges and C. Essau state that they have no conflict of interest.

This article does not include studies on humans or animals.

About this article

Cite this article

Nilges, P., Essau, C. The Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scales. pain29, 649-657 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-015-0019-z

Download citation

keywords

  • Questionnaires
  • Psychological stress
  • pain
  • sensitivity
  • Specificity

Keywords

  • Questionnaire
  • Mental stress
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity
  • Pain